PHI 208 Week 3 Reading Quiz (Variant 7)

Download here:
http://www.onlinehomework.company/product/phi-208-week-3-reading-quiz-variant-7/

PHI 208 Week 3 Reading Quiz (Variant 7)

1. What is the argument by Ronald Duska, which Robert Larmer presents?

2. According to Friedman, what are the responsibilities of corporate executives?

3. DeGeorge explains that whistleblowing moves from being morally permissible to mandatory when:

4. How would the Kantian moral theory apply in resolving the negative effects on a community?

5. What is the explanation of the standard view on whistleblowing presented by Sissela Bok and reported by Robert Larmer in his article?

6. By stakeholders, Freeman refers to:

7. Milton Friedman argues that even if the corporate executive were justified in funding social causes with his/her corporation’s profits, he/she could not achieve the success of such social causes because:

8. How can we best understand Milton Friedman’s objection that only persons, not businesses (i.e., corporations), have responsibilities?

9. How does Milton Friedman present the common understanding of socially responsible acts on the part of business?

10. The legal argument that Freeman presents can be summed up like this:caveat emptor has been replaced with caveat venditor. This means that:

11. A perfect duty:

12. What is the Kantian (deontological) criticism that Lop raises against DeGeorge’s position?

13. Reason is a faculty that we have that:

14. According to Kant, persons:

15. Which is one of the claims that Milton Friedman presents to make the case that a corporate executive who undertakes acts that are in line with the common understanding of corporate social responsibility is also accepting the doctrine of socialism?