PHI 208 Week 3 Reading Quiz (Variant 4)

Download here:
http://www.onlinehomework.company/product/phi-208-week-3-reading-quiz-variant-4/

PHI 208 Week 3 Reading Quiz (Variant 4)

1. According to Friedman, what are the responsibilities of corporate executives?

2. Milton Friedman’s main point is not to argue against socially responsible goals but:

3. According to DeGeorge, whistleblowing is morally permissible when the following condition(s) is/are met:

4. Which businessmen, according to Friedman, are typically excluded in the rhetoric of the social responsibility of business?

5. Reason is a faculty that we have that:

6. DeGeorge explains that whistleblowing moves from being morally permissible to mandatory when:

7. What is the argument by Ronald Duska, which Robert Larmer presents?

8. Harm may be understood as:

9. By stakeholders, Freeman refers to:

10. Milton Friedman argues that even if the corporate executive were justified in funding social causes with his/her corporation’s profits, he/she could not achieve the success of such social causes because:

11. It is unfair to criticize the profit-making purpose of business because:

12. What is the Kantian (deontological) criticism that Lop raises against DeGeorge’s position?

13. How can we best understand Milton Friedman’s objection that only persons, not businesses (i.e., corporations), have responsibilities?

14. The economic argument that Freeman presents the view that Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” doctrine does not take into account externalities, moral hazards, and monopoly power. Since there are no incentives to incur in costs of internalizing the negative effects of a corporation’s production and marketing operations, then this means that:

15. Kant claims that a good will is: