PHI 208 Week 3 Reading Quiz (Variant 3)

Download here:
http://www.onlinehomework.company/product/phi-208-week-3-reading-quiz-variant-3/

1. How are suppliers negatively affected?

2. A perfect duty:

3. Kant claims that the moral law is given to each person by:

4. The legal argument that Freeman presents can be summed up like this: caveat emptor has been replaced with caveat venditor. This means that:

5. Reason is a faculty that we have that:

6. By stakeholders, Freeman refers to:

7. Kant claims that a good will is:

8. DeGeorge explains that whistleblowing moves from being morally permissible to mandatory when:

9. Milton Friedman argues that persons may choose to undertake social responsibilities to their communities, churches, or nations, and devote their own incomes to causes that they deem morally worthy. But, he adds, if corporate executives attempt to take such social responsibilities or to direct the corporation’s profits to such personal causes, without approval from the shareholders, then:

10. According to DeGeorge, whistleblowing is morally permissible when the following condition(s) is/are met:

11. Milton Friedman observes that if the same argument that advocates of corporate social responsibility say should be brought to corporate shareholders is instead brought before union members, the logical bankruptcy of the argument would be clearly evident because:

12. According to Friedman, what are the responsibilities of corporate executives?

13. What is Larmer’s criticism of Duska’s argument?

14. Edward Freeman article does not criticize capitalism nor does it seek its demise. Rather, it argues that managers (what Milton Friedman calls corporate executives) do not merely have a fiduciary duty to stockholders but also to:

15. Which is one of the claims that Milton Friedman presents to make the case that a corporate executive who undertakes acts that are in line with the common understanding of corporate social responsibility is also accepting the doctrine of socialism?