PHI 208 Week 3 Reading Quiz (Variant 10)

Download here:
http://www.onlinehomework.company/product/phi-208-week-3-reading-quiz-variant-10/

PHI 208 Week 3 Reading Quiz (Variant 10)

1. What is Larmer’s criticism of Duska’s argument?

2. How are suppliers negatively affected?

3. The legal argument that Freeman presents can be summed up like this:caveat emptor has been replaced with caveat venditor. This means that:

4. Kant explains that respect for a person is:

5. How would the Kantian moral theory apply in resolving the negative effects on a community?

6. By stakeholders, Freeman refers to:

7. How are employees negatively affected?

8. How does Milton Friedman present the common understanding of socially responsible acts on the part of business?

9. According to Friedman, what are the responsibilities of corporate executives?

10. Kant claims that the moral law is given to each person by:

11. What is the Kantian (deontological) criticism that Lop raises against DeGeorge’s position?

12. Which is one of the claims that Milton Friedman presents to make the case that a corporate executive who undertakes acts that are in line with the common understanding of corporate social responsibility is also accepting the doctrine of socialism?

13. Kant claims that a good will is:

14. Milton Friedman argues that persons may choose to undertake social responsibilities to their communities, churches, or nations, and devote their own incomes to causes that they deem morally worthy. But, he adds, if corporate executives attempt to take such social responsibilities or to direct the corporation’s profits to such personal causes, without approval from the shareholders, then:

15. Milton Friedman observes that if the same argument that advocates of corporate social responsibility say should be brought to corporate shareholders is instead brought before union members, the logical bankruptcy of the argument would be clearly evident because: