PHI 208 Week 3 Readings Quiz (Variant 2)

Download here:
http://www.onlinehomework.company/product/phi-208-week-3-readings-quiz-variant-2/

1. The legal argument that Freeman presents can be summed up like this: caveat emptor has been replaced with caveat venditor. This means that:

2. What is Larmer’s criticism of Duska’s argument?

3. Reason is a faculty that we have that:

4. By stakeholders, Freeman refers to:

5. How would the Kantian moral theory apply in resolving the negative effects on a community?

6. Milton Friedman’s main point is not to argue against socially responsible goals but:

7. Kant claims that the moral law is given to each person by:

8. According to Kant, persons:

9. How can we best understand Milton Friedman’s objection that only persons, not businesses (i.e., corporations), have responsibilities?

10. DeGeorge explains that whistleblowing moves from being morally permissible to mandatory when:

11. According to Friedman, what are the responsibilities of corporate executives?

12. Which is one of the claims that Milton Friedman presents to make the case that a corporate executive who undertakes acts that are in line with the common understanding of corporate social responsibility is also accepting the doctrine of socialism?

13. What is the argument by Ronald Duska, which Robert Larmer presents?

14. Edward Freeman article does not criticize capitalism nor does it seek its demise. Rather, it argues that managers (what Milton Friedman calls corporate executives) do not merely have a fiduciary duty to stockholders but also to:

15. What is the explanation of the standard view on whistleblowing presented by Sissela Bok and reported by Robert Larmer in his article?